How Flesh-Eating Screwworms Are Driving Up U.S. Beef Prices

---

Introduction

Imagine planning a family barbecue, only to discover that the price of your favorite cut of steak just jumped overnight. That’s the reality facing American beef lovers this summer. In May 2025, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced an immediate halt to cattle imports from Mexico after inspectors detected New World screwworms—parasitic insects whose larvae burrow into living tissue, feeding on flesh and causing severe injury or death in livestock. With the domestic herd already at historic lows, restricting cross-border cattle flows creates a new bottleneck in an industry stretched thin. Ranchers worry about losing essential calf supplies needed to sustain beef production. Consumers brace for yet another spike at the grocery store. In this post, we’ll explore what screwworms are, why the USDA took such drastic action, and how this decision might ripple through ranches, feedlots, homesteads, and dinner plates across America.

---

---

1. What Are New World Screwworms?

New World screwworms (Cochliomyia hominivorax) are parasitic flies native to parts of Central and South America. Unlike most maggots, which feed on dead tissue, screwworm larvae actively consume live flesh. A single female screwworm can deposit hundreds of eggs in an open wound or orifice on a suitable host—cattle, sheep, goats, or even wild animals. Once hatched, the larvae burrow deeper, secreting proteolytic enzymes that liquefy tissue and facilitate feeding.

Key Characteristics:

• Life Cycle: Females lay 200–300 eggs on fresh wounds. Larvae hatch within 12–24 hours, feeding for 5–7 days before dropping off to pupate in the soil. Adults emerge in about a week.
• Damage to Livestock: Infested animals experience intense tissue destruction, secondary bacterial infections, and systemic shock. Left untreated, infestations can be fatal within days.
• Historical Context: Screwworms were once endemic from the southern United States through Argentina. Intensive eradication efforts using the sterile insect technique—where irradiated male flies are released to mate with wild females, resulting in nonviable offspring—successfully eliminated screwworms from the U.S. by 1966 and from parts of Central America by the 1990s. However, the insect remains present in tropical regions of South America and the Caribbean.

Why It Matters Now:
A single screwworm infestation in livestock can devastate entire herds if not contained swiftly. In May 2025, inspectors found screwworm larvae on imported cattle in a Texas border facility, triggering alarm bells. Since reintroduction threatens to undo decades of eradication, USDA officials deemed a temporary import ban necessary—even though American ranchers rely heavily on Mexican calves to replenish their herds.

---

2. Why the USDA Banned Cattle Imports from Mexico

Immediate Response to Infestation

On May 10, 2025, USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) confirmed the presence of New World screwworm larvae in lesions on two steers arriving at the Presidio port of entry in Texas. Standard protocol requires immediate quarantine and testing of affected animals, but the detection of a pest of this severity triggered a more expansive measure: a full suspension of live cattle imports from Mexico. APHIS cited the risk of introducing a breeding population that could spread unchecked through U.S. livestock.

“The detection of screwworms is unacceptable,” a USDA spokesperson said in a press release. “We will not risk a full-scale re-establishment of this parasite in the domestic herd. Until we can certify that shipments are free of infestation, all imports are halted.”

Historical Precedent

This type of ban is not unprecedented. In 2016, a small outbreak in Florida prompted a regional quarantine and targeted sterile insect releases to stamp out residual populations. But that flare-up was contained locally without halting broader meat or calf imports. The 2025 incident, unfortunately, appeared in a high-volume shipping corridor handling thousands of head per week, making immediate containment more challenging.

Balancing Biosecurity and Trade

USDA officials stress that the ban is temporary—intended to allow time for more rigorous screening, increased cooperation with Mexican authorities, and deployment of sterile insect control measures south of the border. However, tightening biosecurity inevitably slows trade. Every week that imports remain suspended reduces the supply of calves available for U.S. feedlots, pushing up demand for domestically bred animals that are already in short supply.

Link to Source:

• USDA Press Release: APHIS Halts Cattle Imports to Prevent Screwworm Spread

---

3. Impact on U.S. Cattle Supply

A Herd at a Multi-Decade Low

According to USDA’s Cattle Inventory Report (January 2025), the U.S. cattle herd sits at approximately 83 million head—its smallest size since 1951. Back-to-back drought years in key ranching regions (Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas) led producers to liquidate breeding stock, cutting layers (breeding cows and heifers) to record lows. Feedlot placements declined throughout 2024 as fewer feeder cattle were available. In this context, any loss of calves from Mexico exacerbates an already strained system.

Importance of Mexican Calves

Texas and other border states depend on Mexican-born calves for two main reasons:

1. Supplemental Supply: After U.S. ranches sold off breeding stock in drought years, producers rely on lower-cost Mexican calves (often Brahman crosses suited to southern climates) to rebuild herds and maintain feedlot throughput.
2. Cost Dynamics: Mexican calves typically trade at $20–$30 per hundredweight less than U.S.-bred counterparts. This price advantage allows packers and feedlots to maintain margins, translating to more stable wholesale beef prices—until now.

In April 2025, Mexico exported roughly 100,000 head of feeder cattle to the United States. With the new ban, that vital supply channel is shuttered. As of early June, USDA estimates show monthly cattle imports down by 95%, a shortfall of around 90,000 head.

Feedlot Dynamics

Feedlots, which finish calves until they reach slaughter weight (1,200–1,400 pounds), typically purchase animals at 500–600 pounds. Without Mexican calves, feedlots must outbid one another for a shrinking pool of domestic feeders. This drives up feeder-cattle prices—and ultimately, live cattle (slaughter-ready) prices. According to the CME, in the two weeks following the ban, feeder-cattle futures rose by 12% and live cattle futures jumped by 8%.

Key Data Points:

• Domestic Cattle Inventory: 83 million head (January 2025)
• Typical Monthly Mexican Calf Imports: 100,000 head
• Drop in Imports (Post-Ban): ~95% reduction (≈95,000 fewer head per month)
• Price Movements (May 2025): Feeder cattle futures +12%; live cattle futures +8%

---

4. Economic Trade-Offs: Ranchers vs. Consumers

Rancher Concerns

For American ranchers—especially those in Texas, New Mexico, and other border-adjacent states—the import ban presents a double-edged sword:

1. Rising Replacement Costs: Smaller ranches that lost breeding stock during drought must purchase expensive replacements. A 500-pound calf in May 2025 averaged $210 per hundredweight—a 25% increase from January.
2. Reduced Profit Margins: Higher input costs (feed, fuel, labor) already squeezed small operators. The need to pay premium prices for replacement calves further erodes profitability.
3. Risk of Screwworm Spread: Beyond economics, ranchers must now serve as extra eyes in the pasture. They need to inspect animals daily for signs of screwworm infestation—wounds that might harbor eggs or larvae. Missing early symptoms can lead to costly veterinary bills and potential herd losses.

“This situation is like walking a tightrope,” said a South Texas rancher who requested anonymity. “If you don’t secure calves to rebuild your herd, you lose out on future income. But paying higher prices now means your margins evaporate, and you’re one bad year of weather away from going under.”

Consumer Impact

On the consumer side, higher cattle prices translate directly to higher beef prices at retail:

• Carcass-to-Retail Amplification: A $10 per hundredweight increase in live cattle costs can translate to a $0.25–$0.30 per pound hike in retail beef prices (depending on cut). With grocery chains currently paying over $180 per live hundredweight (as of early June 2025), shoppers are already seeing ribeyes at $16–$18 per pound—prices not seen since 2021.
• Affected Demographics: Low- to middle-income families, for whom beef represents a key protein source, will likely bear the brunt. While some consumers might shift toward chicken or pork, poultry producers are already experiencing grain-cost pressures that could push chicken prices higher in the fall.
• Restaurant and Foodservice Squeeze: Eateries that rely on beef-centric menus—steak houses, burger joints—face narrowing margins. Some may adjust by raising menu prices or substituting less-expensive cuts, altering the dining experience.

Weighing the Trade-Offs

Pros of the Import Ban:

• Preventing a full-scale screwworm infestation could save billions in livestock losses over subsequent years.
• Maintains long-term herd health, preserving biosecurity gains since screwworm eradication in the 1960s.

Cons of the Import Ban:

• Short-term calf shortage drives up live cattle and beef prices.
• Ranchers face steep replacement costs, risking consolidation of smaller operations.
• Consumers endure higher grocery bills, straining household budgets already taxed by inflation.

Stakeholders—including cattle associations, feedlot operators, and consumer advocacy groups—remain divided. While a healthy herd is critical, some argue that a more targeted approach (e.g., ramped-up inspections and temporary quarantines rather than a total ban) could balance protection with supply continuity. The USDA counters that limited resources and logistical constraints at border stations made an immediate, blanket suspension the only viable option.

---

5. Biosecurity Measures and Alternatives

Strengthening Border Inspections

In response to the ban, APHIS has outlined plans to ramp up screening protocols at major entry points:

• Enhanced Visual Inspections: Inspectors will examine cattle for any open wounds or lesions—primary entry points for screwworm eggs.
• Larval Testing: Random sampling of suspicious lesions, using microscopy to identify screwworm larvae within 24 hours.
• Conditional Release Programs: Cattle that clear initial inspection but originate from “high-risk” zones in Mexico might be diverted to specialized facilities for a 7-day hold and retest before entering U.S. feedlots.

However, these measures require additional funding and trained personnel. In May 2025, Congress granted APHIS a $15 million emergency appropriation to hire 200 new inspectors, purchase specialized screening equipment (including thermal imaging cameras to detect inflamed skin), and upgrade quarantine facilities. Full implementation is expected by mid-July.

Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) Collaboration

To tackle screwworms at the source, USDA is collaborating with Mexico’s National Service for Agrifood Health, Safety, and Quality (SENASICA) to expand Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) programs. SIT involves rearing screwworms in controlled facilities, sterilizing males via radiation, and releasing them into wild populations. Mated wild females produce nonviable eggs, eventually collapsing the local population.

Key Points:

• Existing Infrastructure: Mexico operates a screwworm-rearing facility in Chiapas. This site can scale up sterile-male production by 50% over 60 days.
• Funding: USDA pledged $5 million to support Mexico’s SIT efforts, on the condition that key regions—especially Baja California and Sonora—reach screwworm-free certification within 90 days.
• Expected Outcomes: If successful, SIT could reduce screwworm populations by over 97% in southern Mexican states by September 2025, allowing U.S. inspectors to resume imports with confidence.

On-Farm Biosecurity Practices

Ranchers themselves can bolster defenses against screwworms by:

1. Routine Wound Management: Immediately treating any cuts, abrasions, or surgical sites with insecticide-woven dressings, as screwworm flies lay eggs exclusively in untreated open wounds.
2. Fly-Repellent Protocols: Applying permethrin-based livestock sprays every two weeks during peak fly seasons (April–September).
3. Pasture Sanitation: Regularly rotating grazing areas to reduce fly breeding grounds, since screwworm larvae require warm, moist soil to pupate.
4. Veterinary Surveillance: Scheduling monthly veterinary visits during summer months to examine high-risk animals (calves, older cows with udder wounds) and administer prophylactic Ivermectin, which has been shown to kill emerging larvae before they can establish an infestation.

---

6. Potential Long-Term Effects on the Beef Market

Herd Rebuilding and Consolidation

Even if the USDA lifts the ban by late summer 2025, the loss of nearly 300,000 Mexican calves (assuming a three-month suspension) could shift the industry’s trajectory for years:

• Accelerated Consolidation: Smaller ranches, unable to afford replacement calves at inflated prices, may sell out to larger operations or exit the business entirely. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association estimates that a 10% reduction in small-scale ranchers could result in a 5% decline in total U.S. cattle numbers by 2027.
• Delayed Herd Rebuilding: Surviving ranchers focusing on rebuilding herds domestically may wait 12–18 months before producing new calves back to market weight. The USDA forecasts that national cattle inventories might not recover to 2024 levels until 2028—significantly slowing growth in overall beef production.

Retail Price Volatility

Beef prices have already been ticking upward due to lingering feed-cost pressures and reduced packer capacity. According to the USDA Food Price Outlook (May 2025), average retail beef prices were 15% higher than in May 2024. The screwworm-driven import ban is projected to add an additional 3%–5% by late 2025, depending on how quickly inspectors and Mexican authorities can certify risk-free shipments.

• Popular Cuts vs. Value Cuts: High-end cuts (ribeye, filet mignon) will likely see sharper price jumps—up to $1.50 per pound in some metropolitan areas—since they already carry higher margins. Value cuts (ground beef, chuck roast) may rise more moderately (around $0.50–$0.75 per pound) but still pinch household budgets.
• Substitution Effects: Some consumers will shift toward pork or poultry. However, hog producers face lean price pressures themselves—pork belly futures rose 10% in May 2025 amid Chinese demand. Chicken producers struggle with elevated corn and soybean meal costs, limiting their ability to absorb additional input price increases.

International Trade Ramifications

As U.S. beef supply tightens, export dynamics could shift:

• Reduced Export Volumes: Prior to the ban, the U.S. exported roughly 6.5% of its beef production volume to markets like Japan, South Korea, and Mexico. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association predicts exports could drop by 15%–20% during the import suspension, as packers prioritize domestic needs.
• Export Price Premiums: High international demand and limited supply domestically could push export prices upward. For example, USDA data showed a 12% increase in frozen beef export unit values in Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024.
• Trade Negotiations: Major trade partners may push the U.S. to ease restrictions once the immediate screwworm threat recedes. Negotiations with Canada—currently allowing limited exports of U.S. beef—could become strained if cross-border fears of infestation resurface.

---

7. Implications for Homesteaders and Small-Scale Farms

Screwworm risks and rising beef prices may seem like big-industry issues, but homesteaders and small-scale operations need to pay attention, too. Here’s who should be worried and what to do:

Who Should Be Concerned?

• Livestock Owners with Diverse Herds: Screwworms target any warm-blooded animal with an open wound—goats, sheep, pigs, horses, and even companion animals can be affected. Homesteaders often juggle multiple species, increasing potential exposure.
• Producers Relying on Feeder Cattle Purchases: Small farms that periodically buy weaned calves or feeder steers to finish on pasture may face steeper prices or limited availability, as feedlots outbid them.
• Grass-Based Beef or Dairy Makers: Those producing beef or dairy for local markets will see input costs rise; replacement heifers or steers become more expensive at auctions or from neighboring farms.

What Should Homesteaders Do?

1. Enhance On-Farm Biosecurity: Even if you haven’t seen screwworms locally, prevention is key:
   • Daily Wound Inspections: Check livestock for cuts, fly bites, or surgical sites. Any untreated wound is an invitation.
   • Immediate Wound Care: Clean and cover wounds with insecticide-laced dressings. Many vet-supplied products combine antibiotics with fly-repellents—ideal for small-scale use.
   • Fly Control: Set up sticky traps or manure-management areas away from livestock housing to reduce fly populations. Rotate pens and pastures so young larvae can’t mature uninterrupted.
2. Vet Relationships & Community Networks:
   • Stay Connected with Extension Agents: Your county extension office often sends out alerts if a screwworm case is confirmed regionally.
   • Build a Local Vet Partnership: If screwworms appear nearby, a quick veterinary response (magical larval-killing injections exist) can save an animal before the infestation spreads.
   • Collaborate with Neighbors: Community watch groups—where homesteaders share photos, report odd wounds, or pool resources for fly traps—can stop screwworms before they gain a foothold.
3. Plan for Price Fluctuations:
   • Diversify Income Streams: If beef production becomes less profitable temporarily, consider focusing on other products—pastured pork, free-range poultry, goat milk goods, or fiber animals.
   • Direct-to-Consumer Strategies: As supermarket beef prices climb, local buyers often seek reliable sources. Emphasize transparency (showing your herd’s health practices) and sell freezer bundles or small-batch cuts through CSA shares, farmers’ markets, or online platforms.
   • Bulk Feed Purchases: Collaborate with neighboring farms to buy hay, grain, or mineral blocks in larger quantities—lowering per-unit costs when feed demand spikes.
4. Monitor Market Signals:
   • Auction Alerts: Tune into local livestock auctions for price trends; adjust your buying or selling plans based on feeder-calf supply changes.
   • Commodity News: U.S. cattle futures, corn and soybean prices, and feedlot placement reports all hint at upcoming retail pressures. Even a small-scale homesteader benefits from understanding broader trends.

By tightening on-farm biosecurity, leveraging local support, and adjusting business models to suit shifting prices, homesteaders can weather the screwworm-driven storm. Proactive management reduces the chance of infestation—and turning to direct-to-consumer sales can soften the blow of higher input costs.

---

8. Conclusion

Flesh-eating screwworms may conjure images of blockbuster horror, but in reality, they pose a genuine threat to every layer of U.S. livestock production—from multinational feedlots down to your backyard goats. The USDA’s decision to halt cattle imports from Mexico highlights how quickly a tiny parasite can disrupt supply chains and send beef prices soaring. While large-scale ranchers scramble to replace calves at premium costs, homesteaders need to fortify their flank: daily wound checks, vigilant fly control, and strong community networks become essential. Rising beef prices also open doors for local, pasture-based producers; consumers seeking affordable, transparent meat sources may turn to small-scale farms. By staying informed, upholding rigorous biosecurity, and adapting to market fluctuations, homesteaders and small-scale operations can not only survive but potentially thrive in this shifting landscape.

---

9. What’s Next?

1. Track Regional Alerts: Subscribe to your state extension service or livestock extension email lists. They’ll push notifications if a screwworm case emerges nearby.
2. Join Local Homestead Networks: Whether through Facebook groups or county 4-H meetings, sharing experiences and resources—fly traps, wound-care products—can protect everyone’s animals.
3. Explore Alternative Protein Offerings: If beef prices spike, promote other on-farm products—pastured pork, free-range chicken, goat cheese—as value-added options for customers.
4. Apply for Biosecurity Grants: USDA offers small-farm grants for fencing upgrades or veterinary services. Check grants.gov for current opportunities to defray costs associated with screening and prevention.
5. Educate Yourself: Attend workshops on fly management, parasite control, and market diversification through local ag colleges or extension programs.
6. Plan Your Herd Strategy: If you rely on feeder cattle, consider locking in yearling purchases before winter when prices are historically lower—hedging against mid-year volatility.
7. Stay Flexible: Market conditions will shift as screwworm controls take effect. Reevaluate your on-farm priorities quarterly—be prepared to toggle between beef, pork, poultry, or even specialty niche crops as demand and prices evolve.

By taking these steps—tightening biosecurity, collaborating with neighbors, and adjusting product offerings—homesteaders can mitigate risks, protect their animals, and capitalize on shifting market dynamics. In a world where a single insect can ripple through global supply chains, small-scale farmers who stay informed and nimble hold the advantage.